Minigrant reviewers rubric

Classroom Technology Mini-Grants
Proposal Assessment Rubric
Exemplary: Demonstrates superior quality worthy of imitation and commendable enough to serve as a model. 5
Satisfactory: Demonstrates basic or adequate quality of substance and fulfills all requirements to the average. 4
Sufficient: Demonstrates partial quality adequate for the purpose and enough to fulfill the requirements but without being abundant in substance. 3
Inadequate: Does not demonstrate adequate substance and is not sufficient to meet the requirements. 1
No Basis: Does not demonstrate quality or substance is not recognizably present. 0
Project Title:  0 1 3 4 5  
type project title here No Basis Inadequate Sufficient Satisfactory Exemplary Score
 
Essential Question 10 Points 0 0.0%  
The proposal contains an essential question which probes for deeper meaning and broader understanding of the content addressed by this project. 0 1 3 4 5  
The essential question fosters the development of higher order thinking and problem solving. 0 1 3 4 5  
Project Description 10 Points 0 0.0%  
The proposal includes a brief abstract of the project summarizing the purpose and goals. 0 1 3 4 5  
The proposal describes how technology will be integrated into the design to improve student learning. 0 1 3 4 5  
Goals and Objectives 10 Points 0 0.0%  
The proposal describes specific goals and objectives that relate to the essential question. 0 1 3 4 5  
The proposal explains how those goals will be achieved by the project. 0 1 3 4 5  
Need 10 Points 0 0.0%  
The proposal describes the determination of need for the project that demonstrates its relationship to student achievement. 0 1 3 4 5  
The needs description includes one or more examples of data that support the rationale of need for the project, such as NECAP assessment or other data. 0 1 3 4 5  
Standards Alignment 20 Points 0 0.0%  
Activities are aligned to a primary content area (i.e., Language Arts, Mathematics, Science, Social Studies, The Arts, or World Languages) and at least one standard to be addressed is identified. 0 1 3 4 5  
Activities are aligned to at least one secondary content area (i.e., Language Arts, Mathematics, Science, Social Studies, The Arts, or World Languages), and at least one secondary standard is identified. 0 1 3 4 5  
The proposal indicates the cognitive proficiencies (literacy, numeracy, problem solving, decision making, and/or spatial literacy) to be addressed and how they will be developed. 0 1 3 4 5  
The proposal describes how the activities are aligned to the state ICT Literacy standards, including the creation of specific digital artifacts that can be included in student portfolios. 0 1 3 4 5  
Project Impact: Impact within School   10 Points 0 0.0%  
The proposal indicates the anticipated number of STAFF that will be directly and indirectlyimpacted by the project along with supporting explanations for each. 0 1 3 4 5  
The proposal indicates the anticipated number of STUDENTS that will be directly and indirectly impacted, along with supporting explanations for each. 0 1 3 4 5  
Project Impact: Impact on Other Schools   10 Points 0 0.0%  
The proposal describes how the project will involve or include outreach to multiple schools, or multiple districts. 0 1 3 4 5  
The proposal describes how the outreach to schools or disctircs will increase the impact of the project. 0 1 3 4 5  
Budget 10 Points 0 0.0%  
The budget includes a complete budget spreadsheet outlining the expenses necessary for the proposed project. 0 1 3 4 5  
The budget includes a narrative explaining the expenses necessary for the proposed project. 0 1 3 4 5  
Training Goals 10 Points 0 0.0%  
The proposal identifies at least three specific learning goals the team would like to have addressed during the two evening training sessions they will attend. 0 1 3 4 5  
The proposal explains the need for those learning goals and how meeting those goals will help the project. 0 1 3 4 5  
 
Total for Proposal 100 Points 0 0.0% 0
Notes: