Division
of Program Support |
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Creating
Acceptable Use Policies New
Hampshire school districts are required by New Hampshire law (RSA
194:3-d) to have an acceptable use policy (AUP). 194:3-d School District Computer Networks I. Every school district which has computer systems or networks
shall adopt a policy which outlines the intended appropriate
and acceptable use, as well as the inappropriate and illegal
use, of the school district computer systems and networks including,
but not limited to, the Internet. II. All users of a school district's computer systems or
networks who intentionally violate the district's policy and
who intentionally damage the computer system or network shall
assume legal and financial liability for such damage. For purposes
of this section, "user" means any person authorized
to access the school district's computer systems or networks
including, but not limited to, the Internet. Technology
has provided a link to vast resources for use in K-12 schools. Throught
the Internet, varied and rich resources are available to our students
and about our students. This raises many concerns for school districts
about providing an environment that balances the promises of technology
against its perils. Students and other members of a school district
have an obligation to use the technology appropriately. Having a An
AUP may cover a variety of issues. The K12 technology environment
is so new that there is little case law and legislation directly
related to some of these issues. Therefore, guidance in this AUP
document is based on past court decisions in other environments.
Also, new concerns may emerge as technology's role in schools increases.
Having an AUP is a responsible step toward effective management of
technology use issues. Although
the school board is responsible for the practices of a school district,
AUP issues should be discussed by a broad-based group of stakeholders,
such as a technology planning committee, to insure that all concerns
have been examined. After the development of a school district AUP,
it should be formally approved and periodically reviewed and updated.
We also suggest review of any AUP by school district legal counsel.
Parents should be provided with all information about the AUP, and
retain the option of requesting that their child not be allowed access Students
and district employees retain their constitutional rights, as well
as other rights under state law and collective bargaining agreements.
For example in the case of Tinker v. DesMoines Independent Community
School District, 393 US 503, 506 (1969) the Court recognized that
students "do not shed their constitutional rights to freedom
of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate." However, student
and employee use of any school district system will reflect upon
the district. Therefore, a school district Appropriate Use Policy
sets parameters under which the district system may be used. Remember
that students or employees who wish to exercise greater freedom may
do so outside of school, through their own personal account through
a private provider. |
|||||||||||||
Last
update:
10/9/04
|