Research Collection

Each project year, all higher education institutions were invited to submit research proposals related to the project goals, to extend beyond their integration involvement. Projects were oriented to the particular needs and concerns at each institution. This research collection provides additional information about these projects. Project abstracts are provided below, with links to complete project reports.

Project Abstracts

North Country  
Manchester  
Keene State College -
Year 1
Technology as a Lever:
Effective Practices for Equity
KSC Year One Research Report
KSC Year One Literature Review
Abstract: For all of the emphasis in the last decade on multicultural education, most of today’s educators need continuing support in the development of curricula and pedagogies that provide the most equitable learning environments. Teacher education faculty also need this support to ensure that preservice students, and those educators seeking continuing professional development, have the benefit of the most current research on providing equity in education. This is a particular challenge at Keene State College, where diversity in the faculty and student body is limited. We recognize that national and state social studies standards for students, as well as our own sets of competencies for preservice students, and conceptual framework for our faculty, state that valuing diversity and striving towards equity for all are expected. This project seeks to utilize several technology tools to develop virtual communities of education faculty, in-service educators, and preservice students with broad diversity experiences. Through these virtual communities, curriculum planning efforts will be shared and critiqued. Equity enhancing pedagogies will be discussed and best practices will be researched. Qualitative assessment of changes in planning and delivery of education will take place. Changes in use of the technological tools and in the application of standards will be assessed quantitatively.
Lead Researcher: Ellen L. Nuffer, Ed.D., Keene State College
Plymouth State University - Year 1
Integrating Technology as a Learning Tool in Teacher Preparation Programs and K12 Classrooms
PSC Year One Research Report
Abstract: The purpose of this study is to explore the perceptions and practices of teacher preparation program faculty, pre-service teachers, and classroom K-12 teachers in integrating technology as a tool for learning. Data will be collected through interviews, surveys, distance learning reflections, and artifacts to investigate the range and complexity of technology-integrated instruction in teacher preparation programs and K-12 classrooms. A triangulation of responses will be analyzed for significant technology-related themes and patterns in pedagogy, student learning, and professional development in K-16 learning communities. This research will generate a discussion of the implications for preservice and inservice programs in using technology an integral part of the teaching and learning process.
Lead Researcher: Dr. Dennise Bartelo, Professor of Education and Director of Graduate Studies in Education
Content and/or Methods Faculty: Dr. C. Lynn Davis, Assistant Professor of Education and Assistant Graduate Advisor
Additional Members: Robert Gadomski, Assistant Principal of Belmont Elementary School William Lander, Principal of Belmont Middle School W. Michael Cozort, Assistant Superintendent of Schools, Shaker Regional Schools Irv Connery, Computer Coordinator at White Mountain Regional School District Don LaPlante, Curriculum Director at White Mountain Regional
Plymouth State University - Year 2
Cognitive Mapping for Connecting Thinking, Technology and Writing
PSC Year Two Research Report
Abstract: The research study has three components that address an overarching question: "Do thinking maps and software improve the quality of thinking and writing at multiple levels?" Component One of the Proposal is an experimental research project that asks: "Are the writing skills of first year students in a teacher preparation program significantly improved by the introduction of cognitive mapping and its associated software?" Component Two of the Proposal is a qualitative research project that asks "Does the introduction of Thinking Maps concepts and software have a positive impact on the instructional strategies of student teachers and their public school faculty mentors?" Component Three of the Proposal is a qualitative research project that asks "Does the continuing in-depth training of higher education faculty in Thinking Maps concepts and software have a positive effect on thinking processes and instructional design of those faculty as well as their students?" Through these three components, we hope to determine whether or not to more fully implement these theories and technologies into the teacher preparation and professional development programs. This project will build on previous research from Year 1 of the PT3 grant. Now that we have a picture of the extent of technological competence of various public school and higher education faculty, we will now explore how the cognitive mapping theory with its related software will impact on the teaching and learning processes at multiple levels.
Lead Researcher:
Dr. Kenneth Heuser, Professor of Education and Coordinator of Educational Leadership graduate program
Content and/or Methods Faculty:
Dr. C. Lynn Davis, Assistant Professor of Education and Assistant Graduate Advisor
Additional Members: Dr. David Hyerle, Sarah Curtis, Daniel Cherry
homeback to top  
Rivier College - Year 1
Connecting Higher Education Resources in Science and Social Studies to Teachers (CHRSST)
RIV Year One Research Report
Abstract: The goal of the CHRSST Project is to increase the technological competence of IHE professors through participation in a K-16 virtual partnership. The partnership will increase the content knowledge of elementary school preservice and inservice teachers in science and social studies through web-based, moderated, threaded discussions.
Lead Researcher: Dr. Christy Hammer, Education Department
Content and/or Methods Faculty: Dr. Martin Menke, History Department; Dr. George Kaloudis, Political Science Department; Dr. William Totherow, Chemistry Department; Dr. David Burgess, Physics Department; Dr. Richard Harrington, Biology Department; Dr. Paul Reinbold, Education Department (Science Methods); Dr. Christy Hammer, Education Department (Social Studies Methods); Cathy LaSalle, Integration Monitor
Rivier College - Year 2
Connecting Higher Education Resources in Science and Social Studies to Teachers (CHRSST, Continuation of Year 1)
Rivier Year Two Research Report
Abstract: Building on the successes and correcting for the shortcomings of the pilot year, the Rivier College FY2002 CHRSST project continues to use a web-mediated communication tool to connect education and content professors at Rivier to public school preservice and inservice teachers with the goal of increasing teacher content knowledge of the NHEIAP science and social studies curriculum frameworks. Additional goals include 1) increasing the technology knowledge of content and education professors that teach future teachers; 2) increasing the technology knowledge of mentor teachers and preservice teachers, and, 3) using technology to strengthen the connections between education and content departments at the IHE level. The FY2002 proposal doubles the project length and scope, and adds a Special Education component focusing on inclusion issues for mainstream teachers, doubles the number of inservice teacher participants, and assures that at least 10 preservice teachers participate. Lead Researcher: Dr. Christy Hammer, Social Studies Methods Professor, Education Department
Content and/or Methods Faculty: Dr. Martin Menke, History Department; Dr. George Kaloudis, Political Science Department; Dr. William Totherow, Chemistry Department; Dr. David Burgess, Physics Department; Dr. Richard Harrington, Biology Department; Dr. Paul Reinbold, Education Department (Science Methods); Dr. Christy Hammer, Education Department (Social Studies Methods); Cathy LaSalle, Integration Monitor; Susan Gately, Special Education Specialist, Education Department
homeback to top  
Southern NH University (NHC) - Year 1
Understanding “best practice” for Second Career Teachers
SNHUa Year One Research Report
Abstract: This research effort will focus nontraditional (second career) students who are prospective teachers. The central theme for this effort will be identifying their specific needs as teacher education students and, more importantly, as future teachers. The few published studies that exist confirm that Nontraditional students face a different set of challenges than do traditional beginning teachers. The role of technology as a communication tool, resource gateway, or learning platform is not even mentioned. This proposed research effort will identify “best practices” for creating Teacher education programs for teaching experienced adults with novice teacher needs.
Lead Researcher: Lelija Roy, Ed.D.
Content and/or Methods Faculty: Second Career Preservice Teachers at a number of IHE partner
Additional Members: Students as study participants and Five PT3 Partners TBA
Southern NH University (NHC) - Year 1
Creating the Online Learning
Community at NHC
SNHUb Year One Research Report
Abstract: NHC's Technology Vision (15 June, 1999) speaks of a technology-enhanced teaching and learning environment where workspaces, discussion groups, bulletin boards, chat rooms and conferences occur online. The PT3 project being proposed extends this vision to the Online Learning Community specifically designed to support preservice teacher candidates. This is essentially a proposal to make this “vision” real.
Lead Researcher: Lelija Roy, Ed.D.
Content and/or Methods Faculty: Jane Satero Legacy, Ed.D. (or other faculty member TBA)
Additional Members: Other faculty, students, alumni, mentors TBA
Southern NH University - Year 2 Self Efficacy of NH Teachers/Preservice/IHE Faculty with Integration of Technology
SNHU Year Two Research Report
Abstract: This project focuses on “self-efficacy” of NH Teachers during the change process of technology integration. “Self-efficacy” is defined as the extent to which the individual believes they are capable of performing the action necessary to produce desired results. Hypothesis--“Successful technology integration depends on acquiring skills (measured by Levels of Technology Integration (LoTi)) AND enhanced “self-efficacy” (measured by Concerns Based Adoption Model (CBAM). By understanding the LoTi/CBAM profiles, this study informs the professional development evaluation as well as enhancing our ability to successfully navigate the change process central to the technology integration and adoption rate.
Lead Researcher: Dr. Jane Legacy
Content and/or Methods Faculty: Dr. Marsha Carter , Dr. Lelija Roy, Dr. Susan Schragle-Law
homeback to top  
University of New Hampshire - Year 3
Pre-service Middle School Teachers Reflecting on Instructional Practice Through Technology
Abstract: Our teacher education program encourages pre-service interns to improve their teaching by engaging in self-reflective practices, such as leading a colloquium on an important pedagogical question. However, faculty have not systematically investigated the format and results of colloquia to determine its benefit. This study will examine changes in interns' teaching practices and beliefs as they are guided by a mentor teacher and university faculty in building an electronic Exhibit of Practice as their colloquium. Evidence for change will be gathered from classroom observations of teaching, interviews, journal reflections, and the final Exhibits. This research contributes to the technology skills and practices of higher education faculty and pre-service teachers and to the development of expertise in K-12 faculty.
Co-lead Researchers: Dr. Eleanor Abrams, Associate Professor, University of New Hampshire; Dr. Michael Middleton, Assistant Professor, University of New Hampshire
Additional Members: Michael Gillett, Media Specialist, University of New Hampshire; Jason Demers, Middle School Teacher, Oyster River Middle School; Sarah Demby, Teaching Intern, Oyster River Middle School; Samantha Hegger, Teaching Intern, Oyster River Middle School; Sarah Hughes, Teaching Intern, Oyster River Middle School ;Timothy Murphy, Teaching Intern, Oyster River Middle School
Upper Valley Teacher Institute - Year 1
The Virtual Classroom: Mentoring and Modeling for the Mature Learner in Preservice Teacher Training
UVTI Year One Research Report
Abstract: The research project will focus on two questions:
1) The mature learner brings unique learning needs to pre-service teacher training, including a wide range of comfort and experience with technology. How can the virtual classroom accommodate those needs, and simultaneously provide the instruction and modeling that enables these teachers to integrate technology into their own instructional practice?

2) The unique structure of the UVTI program lends itself quite well to the use of the tools of the virtual classroom in the mentoring and supervision of its interns. How does the use of these tools in that mentoring relationship affect (a) the relationship between the interns, mentors and supervisors, and (b) the intern’s instructional practice in integrating technology?
Lead Researcher: Maryanne P. Murach, Adjunct Faculty, UVTI
Content and/or Methods Faculty: James H. Nourse, Executive Director, UVTI; Susan B. Lamdin, Assistant Director, UVTI; Mary Victor Giersch, Program Supervisor, UVTI; Lisa Kaija, Program Supervisor, UVTI; Martha Whitney, Program Supervisor, UVTI; Zooey Zullo, Program Supervisor, UVTI; Joanne Tuxbury, Workshop Presentor, Sunapee Elementary; Additional Members: Dan Hudkins, Technology Director, Sunapee School District
Upper Valley Teacher Institute - Year 2
Electronic Mentoring of Lateral-Entry Learners in Pre-service Teacher Training
Abstract: The purpose of this study is to determine whether electronic mentoring by supervisors, mentors and peers improves the practicum experience of lateral-entry, career change, adult learners (interns) during their pre-service teacher training.
1. Does electronic mentoring change the relationship between student and mentors, and learning and knowledge? (Hasselbring, Barron, and Risko, 2000, p.15).

2. Does electronic mentoring provide greater collegial support and guided reflection for interns who spend the majority of their time isolated from their peers, their supervisors, and their faculty?

3. What kinds of structure and resources do the mentors need to work productively with the interns (mentees) during their practicum experience? (Feiman-Nemser, 1996, p.2).
Lead Researcher: Maryanne P. Murach, Adjunct Faculty, UVTI
Content and/or Methods Faculty: James H. Nourse, Executive Director and Supervisor, UVTI; Lisa Q. Kaija, Assistant Director and Supervisor, UVTI; Dan Hudkins, Information Technology Coordinator, Sunapee School District; Additional Members and Affiliation: Joanna Carr, UVTI Program Supervisor and Instructor; Dale Gilson, UVTI Program Supervisor; Frank Gould, UVTI Program Supervisor; Mary Victor Giersch, UVTI Program Supervisor; Ashley Milliken, UVTI Program Supervisor; Marty Whitney, UVTI Program Supervisor and Instructor; Janet Zullo, UVTI Program Supervisor and Instructor; Joanne Tuxbury, Instructor, UVTI – Grade 4 Teacher, Sunapee Elementary School

homeback to top