Effective Projects Case Study
NWEA Testing at Franklin School District
www.franklin.k12.nh.us
This
is a story about a project that started 12/1/2006.
For more information, please contact: Rebecca Gagnon
at rgagnon@franklin.k12.nh.us.
We wanted to increase our use of the NWEA MAP testing to
include 9th and 10th grade students. We test in reading, language usage,
math, and science. By adding the high school students, we have a consistent
method of testing all students in grades 2-10. This testing allows us to set
individual student goals, deliver instruction at the appropriate learning
levels of each student, and assess their individual gains in learning within
the same school year. As we move towards becoming a district that makes decisions
based on student data, this testing provides us with a critical piece of our
data set.
|
Funding: This project was supported by $10,438 from NCLB
Title II-D (Educational Technology) and $6,800 in local funds. The project illustrates how federal
funding supports “Data collection and analysis
– Implementing individualized instruction by collecting, managing, and
analyzing data to inform and enhance teaching and school improvement efforts.”
The project addressed the following grades and content areas:
PreK-2 Gr3-5 Gr6-8 Gr9-12 EngLangArts Math Science
|
The
Setting:
Although classified as a city, Franklin
schools have a total population of less than 1500 students and a poverty rate
higher than 50%. Despite this high rate, we are rich in technology with
mobile labs in each school and multiple computers in each elementary school
classroom. Two years ago, Franklin made the commitment to provide all
certified staff members with a laptop. We rely heavily on our network and a
terminal services environment to ensure that our equipment maintains
longevity while our resources stay current. With our current SAU
administration, we are working to change the culture of Franklin into one
that makes decisions for our programs and resources based on data. School
Portfolios, Data Teams, Performance
Tracker, TechPaths Curriculum Mapping, student portfolios, NWEA testing,
NECAP testing, Reading First, and a number of other programs are all spokes
on the wheel of our Follow the Child commitment.
The plot: For us, the biggest challenge was making the shift
in each school and as a district to become a system that uses data. Learning
how to read data, interpret data, and really, having conversations about data
was a challenge. We relied heavily on a number of training sessions to
provide both administrators and teachers with the tools and training to make
this happen. Because NWEA testing is
still relatively new, scheduling is something we struggle with during
implementation. Trying to test 1400 students - in four subject areas - during
the first month of school - while trying to have the smallest impact on the
school day, was difficult. We had the resources and the technology worked
very well. Just scheduling the four different buildings was a challenge –
especially at the high school level.
The teachers: 65
teachers were directly involved. All of our
teachers in grades 2-10 were involved. That’s about 65 teachers. They were
all important in many ways. In each school, there were a few teachers who
took on the role of Proctor for the testing. They helped to make the actual
testing happen. Then, there were teachers at each school who were
specifically trained by NWEA to access and read MAP results. They became the
trainers in their buildings for all the other teachers. Another group of
teachers at each school were part of the school’s data team and meet with the
principals on a regular basis to look at various data sources and help to
make decisions around curriculum and instruction for the students. Every
teacher is responsible to use the data available on a regular basis to make
adjustments within their classrooms to meet the needs of their students.
The
students: This project was
all about the students. The goal of NWEA testing is to provide teachers with
a clear understanding of each individual child’s learning readiness level.
This way, teachers can develop lessons and groupings that will accommodate
the learning level of the individual students in each subject area. The
teachers and students are given a growth target goal for each student to meet
by the end of the school year and they are provided with a list of what that
means in relation to both the NH standards and their individual learning
continuum. We were able to do flexible groupings for students around
different topics in each subject area that allowed for students to learn at a
level that was appropriate for them.
The
data:
We collect MAP scores from students and will
continue to do so. Our hope is that students are meeting their growth
targets. As for the implementation of this project, we have anecdotal data
and surveys from each school’s data team, proctor group, and teachers as to
how the testing process worked, how successful/helpful the trainings were,
and how the data helped inform curriculum instruction.
|
The difference: We are
about to do our Spring testing and will know at the conclusion of that
testing cycle what gains were made. As for teachers, they are much more
confident about having discussions centered on data as well as how to
differentiate instruction within their classroom. Our NECAP scores improved. While this is not a
direct result of MAP testing, we do believe from what we have seen and heard from
teachers is that the NWEA testing has helped them focus on the strengths and
weaknesses of their students, allowing them to make the modifications
necessary in a timely fashion.
Essential
conditions: We had to have a well organized
testing environment. Students needed
to be prepared for the test and understand its importance. Teachers needed to be prepared for the
testing and know what was expected of them before, during, and after the
testing. Parents need to be aware of
the testing – what it is and what it means.
Everyone (administrators, proctors, teachers) needed to be well
trained in their roles for this process.
Changes
for the future: We need to find
way to help the high school students feel more connected to the testing.
Some, not all, did not take this testing as seriously as we would have liked
them to. We would like to have done the
evaluation after the second testing session to see if gains were made as we
hope.
Recommendations: NWEA testing is an excellent indicator of how
successful your curriculum and instruction are. The first step for anyone
thinking about doing this testing would be to determine exactly why you want
to do the testing. We would suggest that you develop a three-year
implementation plan and work with small groups to roll this out. Be sure
ahead of time that staff is clear on why this testing is happening and what
you will use the results for. Training is key and critical if this is going
to be used successfully.
Telling
our story: We communicate with parents by sending
home MAP results and we use them as a piece of the conversation during
parent/teacher conferences. We also do a report to the school board and
release general results to them. We need to do a better job of goal setting
and communicating with students on an individual basis about what their MAP
scores mean.
Documents
to share: We pulled a lot of our resources from the NWEA
website – www.nwea.org.
|