Effective Projects Case Study
Digital Tools at Seabrook School District
www.sau21.org/seabrook
This
is a story about a project that started 12/15/2006.
For more information, please contact: Stan Shupe
at sshupe@sau21.org.
Seabrook School District's goal was to engage and motivate
student learning by introducing new technology into the classroom with the
purchase of two complete SmartBoard interactive whiteboard systems including
boards, projectors, mobile carts, and laptop computers. Additionally, money was budgeted to provide
schoolwide training in the use of SmartBoards, NWEA analysis training, and
attendance for 4 staff members at the Christa McAulliffe Technology
Conference giving teachers an opportunity to learn the latest strategies,
hardware, and software for integrating technology in the learning experience.
|
Funding: This project was supported by $10,000 from NCLB
Title II-D (Educational Technology) and $1,500 in local funds. The project illustrates how federal
funding supports “Access - Enhancing existing
technology and acquiring new technology to support education reforms and
improve student achievement (includes servers, desktops, laptops,
peripherals).” The project addressed the following grades and content
areas:
Gr6-8
EngLangArts Math Science SocSt TheArts
|
The
Setting:
Seabrook Middle school has a population of
approximately 375 students dispersed in grades 5-8 with four core subject teachers
in grades 6-8, and 4 self contained classrooms in grade 5. Seabrook is a low income community of just
over 8,000 residents undergoing a transition from a long standing fishing
community to a more populated urban area.
Seabrook youth face extreme challenges regarding personal, social, and
community risk factors. Two such
factors that are directly linked to a young persons current and future well
being identify Seabrook with its lowest rankings – NH Child Potential Index
finds Seabrook in the lowest quartile and Kids Count NH ranks Seabrook among
the poorest fifth of all school clusters. The
cycle of poverty presents high
risk to the lives of many Seabrook families: 7 percent unemployment, 25% single female
households, average income of $20,000, 17% of children living in
poverty, and only 14.8% of residents
aquiring a bachelors degree or higher. Seabrook suffers from the infliction
of perceived lower community status through urban legend stereotyping and the
resultant phenomena of a self-fulfilling prophecy that limits individual
growth. Many Seabrook students do
not have computer access in the home, so it is essential to take advantage
of opportunities created by information technologies at school and to provide
opportunities for integrating 21st century skills to motivate learning and
make progress towards state performance targets.
The plot: The biggest challenge to integrating any new
technology into the classroom, particularly in a core subject, is overcoming
the reluctance of the teaching staff to learn about and use a technology they
are unfamiliar with. Training was
offered to the entire staff during an in-service day, with 3-4 staff members
becoming "experts" available for trouble shooting. Initially, the plan was to have the SmartBoards available
to all staff from a loaner pool. As
the project progressed, the same teachers were using the SmartBoards which
were ultimately assigned to their rooms exclusively. As the teachers and students became more
familiar with and adept at SmartBoard use, they became ambassadors for their
implementation in other classrooms.
The teachers: 35
teachers were directly involved. Initially the
entire staff was involved in training, but ultimately 4 teachers took a
dominant role - The computer teacher, media specialist, 8th grade science
teacher, and the music teacher all had SmartBoards placed permantly in their
classrooms. All but the science
teacher service the entire student population so all middle school students were
exposed to SmartBoards in three curriculum areas.
The
students: While staff
members who had SmartBoards in their classrooms collaborated on usage ideas
and tips, the students also became experts and began sharing with their
teachers some idea or concept that they learned in another class. The project implemetation became a team
effort.
The
data:
Student and Teacher assessment surveys were
created to provide feedback specifically on the effectiveness of the
SMARTBoards in the classroom from the teaching and learning point of
view. Five survey questions asked
students and teachers to rate the SMARTBoard on an agree/disagree scale as
well as two open ended response questions. The
results were overwhelmingly positive. 81% percent of students strongly agreed or
agreed that SMARTBoard presentations were interesting to them, 82% of
students strongly agreed or agreed that it is easier to pay attention in
class when their teacher uses the SMARTBoard, and 59% of students strongly
agreed or agreed that they remember more when their teacher uses the
SMARTBoard presenting a lesson. All
teachers surveyed strongly agreed or agreed that a SMARTBoard in their
classroom created greater class participation, engaged students, and allowed
them to create lessons that motivated their students.
|
The difference: Our
primary goal was to engage students and motivate learning - the results of
our teacher and student surveys clearly indicate success. Student achievement in assessment scores
such as NWEA at
Seabrook Middle School
did show an overall improvement in the last year, however,
we have instituted many new programs and initiatives in the last year that
contributed to improvement, not specifically the SmartBoard project. At the Collaborative Evaluation session Seabrook
attended in January (for Title IID grant awardees), it was suggested that attendance
could be an area impacted by the use of digital tools. We
are looking at ways to measure if classrooms that use digital tools have better
attendance than those that don't and may look at office and nurse's logs during
specific periods for use in future evaluations.
Essential
conditions: Project funding, teacher and
student participation and enthusiasm for new technology.
Changes
for the future: SmartBoard
training was offered in the mechanical use of the product. We would expand the training to include
software available and subject specific usage. Our evaluation worked well - wouldn't change anything.
Recommendations: Our pre and post, teacher and student surveys were
extremely helpful in providing a project evaluation, and future needs
assessment. Would also recommend
training in the usage possibilites as well as mechanics of the systems. It would be great to have a math teacher
who uses the technology speak to our math teachers about how they use it
specific to their subject.
Telling
our story: Our project will close on March
31st and notification to the School Board and general public will be made at
that time.
Documents
to share: none at this time
|