Initiating Portfolios in Your School
Case Study #5
The school for Case Study #5 is in a small
rural school district with 500 students. The school has an old computer
lab, but does not have Internet access. Students are taught keyboarding and
word processing, but little else. A few of the teachers attempt to
integrate technology skills into their curricula, but the majority
do not. The school board is not very concerned with the new ICT
standards, even though they were advised of them.
Table of Contents
Introduction
Process
1 Purpose
2 Curriculum
3 Requirements
4 Reviewer
5 Assessment
6 Organization
7 Storage
8 Implementation
This case study was contributed by the following ICT Summer Institute 2006 participants:
Diane Beaman, Erv Connary, Elizabeth Dunton,
Joni Mastronardi, Lisa Moore, Derek Patterson
When making decisions, you might want to use this simple group decision making process…
Brainstorm List as many ideas as the group can develop
Clarify Ask questions about ideas on the list for clarification and understanding
Combine Lump similar ideas or strategies into categories
Rank Place the newly formed categories of ideas in order to preference
Discuss Narrow down the list to a few favorite ideas
Agree Come to a consensus on the idea that best suits the team
Remember these important factors when considering ideas and solutions…
Educational What is the pedagogy behind this idea?
Functional How does this idea actually work?
Technical What technology or equipment is required for this idea to function properly?
Administrative What are the policies, procedures, and budgets required for this idea to work?
Establish the purpose for the portfolio based on your district’s goals and mission.
Determine how existing school or district curriculum aligns with the ICT standards.
Determine the content requirements that will be placed in the portfolio.
Determine the reviewer process for assessing the portfolios.
Design the assessment rubrics to be used for assessing the portfolios.
Establish the portfolio organizational framework to be used when building the portfolios.
Establish the method for storage of the portfolio.
Implement the portfolio generation and assessment process in your school.
This portfolio plan is based
on the scenario outlined below. Depending on your district's individual
assessments and needs, you may wish to change parts of this plan to suit your
needs. Please feel free to use and change any parts of this portfolio
outline as you wish. Good luck!
Scenario:
You are in a small rural school district with 500 students. Your school has an old computer lab, but does not have Internet access. Your students are taught keyboarding and word processing, but little else. A few of your teachers attempt to integrate technology skills into their curricula, but the majority do not. The school board is not very concerned with the new ICT standards, even though they were advised of them.
In light of your school goals and mission…
What do you think the purpose of the portfolio should be?
To create a digital
portfolio to address ICT standards in a teacher and student user-friendly way.
What type of Portfolio would you like to create?
·
The portfolios
will be formative in order to improve understanding, and encourage growth
through feedback with a summative piece that will be evaluated in the eighth
grade to be sure that students have met all ICT standards through their
portfolios. As the formative piece of each
portfolio, each student will review and reflect upon the technology aspects of
their porfolio and artifacts.
Our portfolios will be created using the limited technology available to our
district, but will include all ICT standards using creative applications of the
technology available.
When do you want the ICT competencies to be demonstrated?
· The competencies can be demonstrated by collection of evidence and artifacts at each grade level.
How do you want the ICT competencies to be demonstrated?
· The competencies can be integrated into the content and
demonstrated in connection with evidence of content knowledge. We will
collect evidence of meeting the standards through projects that students
complete within the subject areas during their school career.
Now that you have established the purpose of the portfolio…
How does your current curriculum align with the ICT standards
required for the portfolio?
Determine what you already do in your school that could be used as artifacts for evidence of meeting competency.
Are there existing curriculum activities which produce digital artifacts?
We will start by using
projects that teachers already use in their classrooms and adapt them to employ
more technology. This can involve scanning student work, taking digital
pictures, or using computer software to create the artifacts and save them in
student folders. Tech mentors will help
other teachers adapt projects. Willing teachers could showcase an activity they used for
an artifact at a staff meeting or other all staff gathering. Something
that would only take 2 minutes to show and other teachers could easily
replicate.
Can such artifacts be used in portfolios?
Yes,
artifacts can also include "projects under development" to
demonstrate technology standards utilized by student in transitions stages.
Are they appropriate to use?
Yes, although not all
artifacts will make it into the final portfolio.
Are there areas which deserve more curriculum development?
The use of the different
hardware and software for students AND teachers. Integrating
with specialists such as the media specialists, the tech integrator, art,
music, guidance, P.E., etc.
Are there any areas of redundancy?
To avoid redundancy,
there should be periodic check ins to discuss what
skills are being covered by which teachers. In areas where there is
redundancy, at higher levels it is expected that the skill will be taught in
greater depth. Because the teachers will have access to student folders,
teachers will be able to look at student portfolios and assess areas of need.
Once you have determined what you already do in
your school that could be used as portfolio evidence…
What content requirements does your school want in the portfolio?
All subject areas should be represented at least twice during the eight years of the portfolio, demonstrating all parts of the ICT digital portfolio standards.
Decide the number of artifacts to be used in the portfolio, and whether or not that will change with grade level.
How many artifacts are necessary and adequate?
There should be sufficient artifacts to show mastery of portfolio standards. Artifacts can be any item that shows growth toward the standards, and does not need to be a large finished project. It may include standardized tests, observations, student work, and reflections by the student. All teachers are responsible to give students opportunities to produce digital artifacts so that the students have ample selection to produce a portfolio that showcases the standards.
Will the number of artifacts required change as students advance to higher grades?
Not necessarily. At
the younger grades, students could be producing many small artifacts, while
older students may produce fewer larger, more complex projects.
Now that you know the
content that will be required in the portfolio…
Who will review the portfolios and how will the assessment be done?
Portfolios can also be
reviewed by teams of teachers, school board members,
administrators, parents, community leaders, or any other group that our school
deems capable of evaluating the portfolios for students. This can show
students the importance of technology in the world.
Determine protocols by which the portfolios will be reviewed and assessed.
Should the content teachers review the content artifacts?
Yes, they should be
reviewed as the students produce the artifacts.
Should this be done at each grade level in a formative manner?
Yes.
How should these reviews be tracked?
Each year, the homeroom
teacher will review the portfolio with the student and discuss how the student
has demonstrated understanding and proficiency of the ICT standards. This
should be done at each grade level in a formative manner (reflection of the
year's growth). A sample chart for different portfolio purposes follows; all
four categories are needed over the K-8 portfolio assembly.
|
Growth
Portfolios: What samples might be included? |
|
|
|
|
|
Purpose
|
Some
possible inclusions |
|
a. to show growth or
change over time |
· early and later pieces of work · early and later tests/scores · rough drafts and final drafts · reflections on growth · goal-setting sheets ·
reflections
on progress toward goal(s) |
|
b. to help develop
process skills |
· samples which reflect growth of process skills
· self-reflection sheets accompanying samples of
work · reflection sheets from teacher or peer · identification of strengths/weaknesses · goal-setting sheets · reflections on progress towards goal(s) ·
see more
detail below under Process
below |
|
c. to identify
strengths/weaknesses |
· samples of work reflecting specifically
identified strengths and weaknesses · reflections on strengths and weaknesses of
samples · goal-setting sheets ·
reflection
on progress towards goal(s) |
|
d. to track
development of one or more products or performances |
· obviously, drafts of the specific product or
performance to be tracked · self-reflections on drafts ·
reflection
sheets from teacher or peer |
Tables courtesy of Jonathan
Mueller
http://jonathan.mueller.faculty.noctrl.edu/toolbox/portfolios.htm#purpose
Copyright
2006, Jon Mueller, Professor of Psychology, North
Central College,
Once the protocols for review have been
established…
What criteria will be used to assess the completed portfolios?
The
NETS (National Education Technology Standards), the Information Literacy
Standards and the 21st Century Literacy skills.
Develop a rubric or rubrics which will be used for assessment of the portfolios in your school.
What kinds of assessment rubrics will be needed?
|
Selection of Artifacts |
0 points No artifacts relate to the purpose of the
portfolio. |
1 point Minimal artifacts relate to the purpose of the
portfolio. |
3 points Artifacts relate to the purpose of the
portfolio. |
5 points All artifacts relate to the purpose of the portfolio
and are incorporated into all subject areas. |
Total Points |
|
Reflections |
0 points No reflections explain why the artifact was chosen,
how the artifact proves accomplishment in the goal, a self evaluation of the
work or a plan for future improvement. |
1 point Minimal reflections explain why the artifact was
chosen, how the artifact proves accomplishment in the goal, a self evaluation
of the work and a plan for future improvement. |
3 points Reflections explain why the artifact was chosen, how
the artifact proves accomplishment in the goal, a self evaluation of the work
and a plan for future improvement. |
5 points Reflections explain why the artifact was chosen, how
the artifact proves accomplishment in the goal, a self evaluation of the work
and a plan for future improvement and are incorporated into all subject
areas. |
|
|
Basic Operations and
Concepts |
0 points No evidence of application of computer skills.
|
1 point Minimal evidence of application of computer
skills. |
3 Points Evidence of application of computer skills in the
majority of work completed. |
5 Points Evidence of application of computer skills are incorporated into all subject areas. |
|
|
Social, Ethical and Human
Issues |
0 points No evidence of understanding of social, ethical and
human issues. |
1 point Minimal evidence of understanding of social, ethical
and human issues. |
3 points Evidence of understanding of social, ethical and
human issues. |
5 points Evidence of understanding of social, ethical and
human issues has been incorporated into all subject areas. |
|
|
Technology Productivity Tools
and Strategies |
0 points No variety of productivity tools and strategies are
evident. |
1 point Not enough variety of productivity tools and
strategies are evident. |
3 points A variety of productivity tools and strategies are
evident. |
5 points A wide variety of productivity tools and strategies
have been incorporated into all subject areas. |
|
|
Technology Communication Tools
and Strategies |
0 points No evidence of application of communication tools and
strategies. |
1 point Minimal evidence of application of communication
tools and strategies. |
3 points Evidence of application of communication tools and
strategies. |
5 points Evidence of application of communication tools and
strategies have been incorporated into all subject
areas. |
|
|
Technology Research Tools and
Strategies |
0 points No evidence of application of research tools and
strategies. |
1 point Minimal evidence of application of research tools
and strategies. |
3 points Evidence of application of research tools and
strategies. |
5 points Evidence of application of research tools and
strategies have been incorporated into all subject
areas. |
|
|
Technology and Information
Problem Solving and Decision Making |
0 points No evidence of application of problem solving and
decision making. |
1 point Minimal evidence of application of problem solving
and decision making. |
3 points Evidence of application of problem solving and
decision making. |
5 points Evidence of application of problem solving and
decision making have been incorporated into all subject areas. |
|
|
ICT Skills demonstrated in All
Subject Areas |
0 points No evidence shown. |
1 point Minimal evidence shown. |
3 points Evidence shown in some subject areas. |
5 points Evidence shown in all subject areas. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grand Total |